Surprise. The Attorney General represents ALL of us!
I was trying
to explain my frustration with the Michigan Attorney General to one of the
newest members of our team.
We were
talking about the Public Hearing, an essential step for a lifer before he/she
can be granted parole or a commutation of sentence. The hearing is conducted by
the Michigan Parole Board, but the activity is dominated by an Assistant
Attorney General who mercilessly grills the inmate, who is under oath, not only
about every minute detail of the crime, but also about what he/she was thinking
at the time. The Assistant AG defends his actions, saying he is representing
the “People of the State of Michigan.”
The meaning is clear: He represents the victims of the crime, and their
families.
My complaint
is that the family and friends of the prisoner are also members of the Michigan
populace. He represents us, too, and while he may not realize it, sometimes the
prisoner is actually the most damaged victim in this situation. I’ve had
criticism of our work as prisoner advocates from people who ask, “What about
the victim?” The assumption is that we are on different sides. It’s “we” vs. “they.”
And then my
friend Holly, to whom I was venting, wisely put her finger on it: That’s
one of our major problems today.
So true.
-Our President thinks America can go it alone.
-Votes on major issues in congress are strictly on
party lines, the people be damned.
-It’s important to get a majority of conservatives
or liberals on the Supreme Court, because the other side is evil.
-It gets right down to the personal level. If you
don’t agree with me, you must not like me. Families are split, churches are
split, communities are split.
It begs the
simple question: Aren’t we all in this together?
OK, off my
soap box and back to prisoners. It should be incumbent on all of us to not only
seek healing for victims of crime, but also to seek restorative justice, and healing
and rehabilitation for the perpetrators of crime. Punishment, retribution and
mass incarceration are getting us nowhere and costing us a fortune.
Said
American historian Aberjhani: There is no envy, jealousy, or hatred
between the different colors of the rainbow. And no fear either. Because each
one exists to make the others’ love more beautiful.
Said St.
Paul in the book of Romans: Let us
therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual
edification.
May it start with me.
Comments
Clearly, not saing victims and families should be denied redress. Indeed, victims suffer at the hands of perpetrators. However, civil courts exist for this purpose. It's not the role of criminal couts to deal with civil issues.
Theft of a loaf of bread to feed a hungry family represents a comparatively minor loss to a merchant that should not rise to the level of a third strike (California) and 25-years in prison. Perhaps The People should be prosecuted on a class action basis for negligent oversight of its poor.
If Criminal Prosecutors truly represent The People they should consider what penalties truly serve The People's Interests. It follows, therefore, the appropriate prosecutorial question is "Will the interests of The People's be best served by seeking harsh penalties that inhumanely warehouse men and women under conditions and in associations that breed deviant cultures and mindsets, or will The People's interests be better served by a redemptive criminal justice system that fosters rehabilitation and restoration?