Willie Lyles-Bey deserves better!
It was
Willie Lyles-Bey’s big day.
Mr. Lyles-Bey
was 19 years old when he participated in a crime that went sour and people were
killed. He’s 62 now, and he’s still in prison. But this week there was hope. A
Public Hearing was scheduled, which could lead to a parole. He was excited.
This is a rare occasion for lifers, as the Michigan Attorney General’s Office
likes to point out. It can lead to freedom!
The hearing,
conducted in a specially-designated room in one of the Ionia prisons, was led
by Michigan Parole Board member Ed Heap. His soft-spoken manner obviously put
the inmate at ease, and the hearing was one of the better ones that I have
witnessed.
Then it was
my turn to speak.
Upon
completing my short presentation of support, Assistant Attorney General Scott
Rothermel---who leads the bulk of the questioning regarding the inmate’s
criminal past---asked if I would remain seated.
From that
point on, Mr. Lyles-Bey’s big day suddenly turned south.
Mr.
Rothermel chose that moment, while I was under oath and while a court reporter
was still recording, to launch into a personal discussion regarding previous
comments I had made in a blog regarding Public Hearings. It was an
embarrassment. While I tried, briefly, to present my side of the discussion, it
was very apparent this was not the appropriate venue for such a debate. The
chairman tried to bring a stop to it, for that very reason, but Mr. Rothermel
refused, insisting that he had a couple more points to make.
Call it a
tirade, a tantrum, a personal attack on me. That’s not what is important.
What is
important is that a Public Hearing for a deserving prisoner in the Michigan
prison system got derailed, in front of two Parole Board members, a court
reporter, two Corrections Officers, and six guests.
Do I deserve
an apology? I think so, but again, that’s not what is important.
What is
important here is that two apologies from Assistant Attorney General Scott
Rothermel are in order: the first to inmate Willie Lyles-Bey; and the second to
the Michigan Parole Board.
How will the
state respond? We’ll wait and see.
Comments